Dorothy Strickland, NIEER Distinguished Research Fellow, responds to specific issues raised in various venues by questioners, considering whether literacy standards and related assessments can be developmentally appropriate.
Concern: Kindergarten standards are not appropriate for children that age. Assessment related to reaching standards will not be developmentally appropriate, and results may be misused.
Much of the concern about CCSS relates to two areas–curriculum and assessment–and not to the standards themselves. Please note: The Common Core State Standards are NOT a curriculum. The curriculum must be developed by those responsible for instruction. This might include collaborative efforts by State Departments of Education and school district personnel.
Regarding issues related to the absence of play: Developmental appropriateness has long been a part of our early childhood agenda. Fortunately, there is NOTHING in the CCSS to encourage concerns that there is no room for developmentally appropriate practice. Playful and experiential learning have always been essential elements of an early childhood curriculum and instruction and remain so.
Key Design Considerations are included in the introduction (p.4) of the CCSS: An integrated model of literacy is recommended. That is, the language arts (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) will be integrated with each other and with content of interest and importance to young children. Research and media skills will be blended into the Standards as a whole.
Educators familiar with EC know that the integration of process (ELA) and content (how plants grow, the weather, etc.) is fundamental to theme-based or project-based curriculum and instruction. This has been a basic tenet of early childhood literacy and it remains alive and well. Children explore/research questions related to topics of importance and interest to them. Books, objects, hands-on activities, and media of various types are used to explore topics/themes with children. Teachers engage children as they read aloud to them and discuss what is read. Children are also involved in shared /interactive reading. They are encouraged to follow-up independently as they explore the topics on their own through reading/pretend reading and drawing/writing about topics under investigation.
None of this is new to the field. However, the CCSS promote attention to specific goals, such as: With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text. At the kindergarten level, the text is likely read/shared with the children by the teacher. This Standard encourages listening, responding, sharing ideas. Equally important, children are learning about a topic of interest to them. This will include new information and concepts and often includes new vocabulary or “known” vocabulary used in a new way.
A focus on thinking with text, and problem solving is encouraged. Again, this is meant to be done in a developmentally appropriate way with an emphasis on gradually increasing expectations throughout the grades. The CCSS are intended to promote skills/strategies that go beyond memorization and foster the application of what is learned in new situations.
The use of technology to support curriculum and instruction is encouraged. Indeed, texts may be traditional print or digital. And, we must not forget oral texts–these relate to listening.
Much of the concern expressed about CCSS relates to assessment. Excessive assessment is, indeed, an issue in some states. However, like curriculum, it is not a function of the CCSS. An increased reliance on Summative Assessments, in particular, has caused concern among many educators. Purposes and uses include to:
- inform educators, students, parents, and the public about the status of student achievement
- hold schools accountable for meeting achievement goals
- inform relevant education policies re: areas in need of attention and resource allocation
- adjust/differentiate instruction according to student needs
- gauge performance of teachers and principals.
While these purposes/uses have always existed, they have taken on new emphasis in recent years (especially their use as tools in educator evaluation) and are often linked to the CCSS. For those whose states have adopted the PARCC assessment and others, I encourage a look at the Model Content Frameworks developed to bridge the Standards with the PARCC Assessments. They can be found online at www.parcconline.
- Professional Development should make extensive use of the Model Content Frameworks that accompany the PARCC assessment. The Model Content Frameworks are:
- a voluntary resource not a curriculum
- designed to help teachers better understand the standards and how key elements of the assessment design interact with the standards within a grade and across grade levels.
Appendix A: Common Core Standards for ELA/Literacy: Supporting Research and Glossary. Similar materials may be found in other appendices.
While I appreciate your perspective, and agree that Common Core is not a curriculum, I think what you are missing is the implementation of the CC in *real* districts. What I am seeing is the polar opposite of what you describe – with mandates coming out that children must be reading when they enter K or they are assessed as “lacking”. I recently observed a math lesson ( taken out of the district curriculum manual) that was easily two grades beyond the confused Kindergarten children being asked to manipulate groups of ten in their heads with no manipulatives.
It is well and good to say “But that isn’t what was meant!” , but what I am seeing as a University Professor observing students in the local schools is a highly developmentally inappropriate curriculum being implemented with fear and loathing by stressed teachers and confused students.
As a former classroom teacher, I must agree with Dr. Rouse. I must further point out that the students end up blaming themselves for the confusion in most cases. They somehow hold themselves responsible for not being developmentally capbable of handling the assessment that we (the teacher)
know full well is not appropriate for them. It makes no sense to me.
Pingback: What is Developmentally Appropriate Math? | Preschool Matters... Today!